S5 22-0067 Subject: Oakland Waterfront Ballpark District Project EIR And Jurisdictional Ordinance
From: Planning & Building Department
Recommendation: Conduct A Public Hearing And Upon Conclusion Adopt The Following Pieces Of Legislation:
1) A Resolution (A) Certifying The Environmental Impact Report For The Oakland Waterfront Ballpark District Project (ER 18-016), As Recommended By The Planning Commission; (B) Adopting California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings On Impacts And Mitigation Measures For The Proposed Project With Grade Separation Alternative (Alternative 3), And Rejection Of Other Alternatives And Certain Mitigation Measures As Infeasible; (C) Adopting A Statement Of Overriding Considerations; And (D) Adopting A Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program; And
The "Oakland Waterfront Ballpark District Project" is a major boon for the area. Not only does it keep the ONLY Oakland based team in the area, it's a much needed update to the Howard Terminal and the city of Oakland. It's time to stop letting San Francisco be "THE" go to Bay Area city.
This is a must for the city of Oakland and the greater East Bay. The jobs, tourism, and events are a must to show support for the future vitality of the city, local business and economic rejuvenation of the City of Oakland. I urge the City Council to take this into consideration when they vote because we won't get a second chance at this and we all owe it to past, present, and future generations of Oakland and the surrounding areas.
As a resident of Downtown Oakland, I whole heartedly support this project and while yes we will have to ensure that the port has access to roads I think that can be mitigated and as a whole this is a net benefit to the city and jobs.
This is an exciting project for the City of Oakland. A chance to enhance the waterfront experience for the people of Oakland that will draw visitors. The EIR is well written and considered. Opposition to the EIR is merely an attempt to misuse an important process to slow project through disingenuous means. Opponents will discuss sea level rise, seismic hazards, environmental hazards, traffic and other items all of which are covered in the documents as required by law. These are all smoke screens to opposition to the project whether it be elements of the project, the use of the site, what the A's are contributing as partners with the City on the deal, or just dislike of the City partnering in this deal. Those are all things that can and should be discussed. But holding up the EIR because of those considerations is not an honest way of a community having a discussion. The opponents of this project will still have their chance to have their say (and I'm sure they won't be shy to share their thoughts) but this is a high quality EIR and it should be certified as such.
It’s time for an empty and unused 22 acres to transform the city’s waterfront into a world class destination for all residents and visitors of our great city. The port of Oakland does not need this site and the coliseum is not feasible for a stadium anymore and can be transformed into much needed housing in East Oakland. VOTE YES!!!
Howard Terminal would be a great way to make Oakland and the Bay Area more prosperous and also keep the traditions for the families of A’s fans alive for generations to come!
As a resident of the City of Oakland D5 I strongly urge the City Council NOT to approve the EIR for the A's Howard Terminal Project. That waterfront area is already utilized for the Port and associated jobs. We already have a site at the Coliseum where transit infrastructure is in place and where the area needs capital investment.
Oakland has an opportunity to reinvigorate it's downtown/JLS area by following the examples of other metro ballparks like Oracle, PetCo, and PNC. This would be an incredible boon for the city of Oakland and retain the City's last remaining professional sports franchise after losing the Warriors and Raiders. As a former East Bay resident and currently living in Sacramento I can point to the AAA Rivercats as an example of how even a minor league venue integrated with downtown areas can connect and improve the community. Those calling for redevelopment of the existing Coliseum complex do not understand it is not a viable venue for the future of professional baseball in the City.
I support approval of the EIR and continued negotiations between Oakland, Alameda County and the A's. I was born in Oakland and am a lifelong A's Fan with a planning/gov't background. I know that stadium projects are not only controversial but in the past have proven at times to be bad deals for local government (see - Raiders). I would like to commend the City of Oakland's leadership for doing their due diligence through these negotiations, continuing to emphasize affordable housing, community benefits and ensuring the deal is fiscally sound. Projects of this scale need a champion, who is willing who keep the final goal in mind, hear from all stakeholders, take heat from all sides and negotiate a final agreement that's best for the common good. Howard Terminal can be that project for Oakland and you can be those champions. Not only will it finally realize Jack London Square's long envisioned status as a center of regional nightlife and entertainment, there is a unique opportunity to create additional resources for community benefits, including sorely needed affordable housing that will not exist without this project, period. Lastly - please do not discount the pride in the City of Oakland that the A's and other other now, departed sports teams created. I have moved around the country and proudly represented this City through the community that supports its sports. It saddens me to think that future East Bay kids may grow up only knowing SF as their "hometown" in this way.
The "Oakland Waterfront Ballpark District Project" is a major boon for the area. Not only does it keep the ONLY Oakland based team in the area, it's a much needed update to the Howard Terminal and the city of Oakland. It's time to stop letting San Francisco be "THE" go to Bay Area city.
Despite the challenges, this project will be transformative for Oakland in a positive way.
Jack London Square resident and homeowner - supporting the Howard Terminal ballpark
As a lifetime Oakland A’s fan it’s time to secure the Howard Terminal ballpark. Let’s go A’s, stay in Oakland.
We support Howard Terminal 💚💛💚💛
We need a New Stadium for the: Oakland A's badly. We don't want them to leave Oakland, at all!
I oppose certifying the FEIR. It is incomplete and inadequate.
This is a must for the city of Oakland and the greater East Bay. The jobs, tourism, and events are a must to show support for the future vitality of the city, local business and economic rejuvenation of the City of Oakland. I urge the City Council to take this into consideration when they vote because we won't get a second chance at this and we all owe it to past, present, and future generations of Oakland and the surrounding areas.
As a resident of Downtown Oakland, I whole heartedly support this project and while yes we will have to ensure that the port has access to roads I think that can be mitigated and as a whole this is a net benefit to the city and jobs.
As an East Oakland resident, I wholeheartedly support the A’s Howard Terminal project and believe it is in the best interests of our city as a whole.
This is an exciting project for the City of Oakland. A chance to enhance the waterfront experience for the people of Oakland that will draw visitors. The EIR is well written and considered. Opposition to the EIR is merely an attempt to misuse an important process to slow project through disingenuous means. Opponents will discuss sea level rise, seismic hazards, environmental hazards, traffic and other items all of which are covered in the documents as required by law. These are all smoke screens to opposition to the project whether it be elements of the project, the use of the site, what the A's are contributing as partners with the City on the deal, or just dislike of the City partnering in this deal. Those are all things that can and should be discussed. But holding up the EIR because of those considerations is not an honest way of a community having a discussion. The opponents of this project will still have their chance to have their say (and I'm sure they won't be shy to share their thoughts) but this is a high quality EIR and it should be certified as such.
It’s time for an empty and unused 22 acres to transform the city’s waterfront into a world class destination for all residents and visitors of our great city. The port of Oakland does not need this site and the coliseum is not feasible for a stadium anymore and can be transformed into much needed housing in East Oakland. VOTE YES!!!
I support the EIR. This development will be great for the long term future of Oakland.
Howard Terminal would be a great way to make Oakland and the Bay Area more prosperous and also keep the traditions for the families of A’s fans alive for generations to come!
This will be great for the City of Oakland! They deserve a MLB team.
I support the approval of this very thorough EIR, and continuing negotiations with the A's and Alameda County about this proposal.
As a resident of the City of Oakland D5 I strongly urge the City Council NOT to approve the EIR for the A's Howard Terminal Project. That waterfront area is already utilized for the Port and associated jobs. We already have a site at the Coliseum where transit infrastructure is in place and where the area needs capital investment.
Please approve the EIR. This revitalization of the downtown area is part of what Oakland needs to feel like a safe place to live and hangout!
Oakland has an opportunity to reinvigorate it's downtown/JLS area by following the examples of other metro ballparks like Oracle, PetCo, and PNC. This would be an incredible boon for the city of Oakland and retain the City's last remaining professional sports franchise after losing the Warriors and Raiders. As a former East Bay resident and currently living in Sacramento I can point to the AAA Rivercats as an example of how even a minor league venue integrated with downtown areas can connect and improve the community. Those calling for redevelopment of the existing Coliseum complex do not understand it is not a viable venue for the future of professional baseball in the City.
I support approval of the EIR and continued negotiations between Oakland, Alameda County and the A's. I was born in Oakland and am a lifelong A's Fan with a planning/gov't background. I know that stadium projects are not only controversial but in the past have proven at times to be bad deals for local government (see - Raiders). I would like to commend the City of Oakland's leadership for doing their due diligence through these negotiations, continuing to emphasize affordable housing, community benefits and ensuring the deal is fiscally sound. Projects of this scale need a champion, who is willing who keep the final goal in mind, hear from all stakeholders, take heat from all sides and negotiate a final agreement that's best for the common good. Howard Terminal can be that project for Oakland and you can be those champions. Not only will it finally realize Jack London Square's long envisioned status as a center of regional nightlife and entertainment, there is a unique opportunity to create additional resources for community benefits, including sorely needed affordable housing that will not exist without this project, period. Lastly - please do not discount the pride in the City of Oakland that the A's and other other now, departed sports teams created. I have moved around the country and proudly represented this City through the community that supports its sports. It saddens me to think that future East Bay kids may grow up only knowing SF as their "hometown" in this way.